Scribe & Green on the BIG screen

There are far too many people out there writing “reviews of movie-films & articles about them with absolutely no clue what the hell they’re talking about." Here are 2 more of them! (Well, one of us knows what the h___ we're talking about, but we'll leave it up to you to decide who that is...) Ultimately, can two people as opposite as Scribe and Green agree on anything?? That's where the fun begins. Won't you join us? (Every now and then we'll add a guest review, just for kicks.)

Monday, July 23, 2007

Rear Window

Green's Review:

L.B. "Jeff" Jeffries (James Stewart) is a cooped up photographer because of a broken leg. Stuck in his apartment with a huge cast from his waist to the tip of his toes, Jeffries gets into the habit of eavesdropping on his neighbors through the rear window of his apartment at first using just his eyes but then employing his high powered binoculars and a camera with a zoom telephoto lens. He becomes so suspicious of a neighbor's actions (Raymond Burr), whom circumstantial evidence suggests murdered his wife and dismembered her body. As his suspicions grow, Jeffries recruits the help of his ultra hot girlfriend, Lisa Fremont (Grace Kelly) and his visiting nurse Stella (Thelma Ritter). They call in a reluctant detective friend (Wendell Corey) for assistance who doesn't see anything unusual in the neighbor's actions until... it's almost too late.

This is a character study on how to be nosy without getting caught. The script is adequate - nothing that will knock your socks off. In the hands of a lesser director and cast this film would be a boring disaster. Jimmy Stewart is such an effortless actor and he makes every one around him better. This is the only film in Grace Kelly's short Hollywood career that I've seen, and I must make an effort to change this.

There are some places where the film drags and at just under two hours is a tad bit too long. Hitchcock's knack for suspense is well earned in this movie, and is very selective about what we see and hear. Up until the end we're not quite sure if the neighbor is guilty or not. Director Alfred Hitchcock's trademark cameo comes during one of the peeks into the neighboring songwriter's apartment. He can he seen winding a clock.

The only things that annoyed me about this movie have nothing to do with the movie itself. Because I know you want to know and because I want to rant, here they are in no particular order: A) I could not find this movie in either library I use so had to watch my dad's copy (on VHS!!!) B) My dad's the kind of guy who buys a movie or gets one as a gift and never watches it. I had to remove the cellophane shrink wrap from the cassette!!! There was a coupon on the front of the wrapper that expired in 2001, so he's had this movie for six years and never watched it!!! and C) the format of the movie was Full-Screen. I hate it when they chop stuff off to fit it within the TV screen. Watching movies in Widescreen is sooo much better (unless of couse the movie came out before the advent of Widescreen, in which case there's nothing to miss).


**** out of *****

Scribe's Review:

I liked it, too.


***** out of *****

Labels:

14 Comments:

At 23 July, 2007 20:49 , Blogger lccb81 said...

wow scribe, how insightful.

 
At 23 July, 2007 21:01 , Blogger Tim said...

After all that waiting... that's all you got????

How many think the scribester ought to come out with a real review?

 
At 24 July, 2007 10:58 , Blogger c nadeau & t johnson said...

Thanks, lccb. I figured so much had been written on this movie already, might as well just do what people do in writing workshops when they have nothing new to add.

 
At 24 July, 2007 11:42 , Blogger c nadeau & t johnson said...

Any luck locating the flowers movie?

 
At 24 July, 2007 12:53 , Blogger Tim said...

this is not a writing workshop!

Even Siskel and Ebert/Roeper or Joel Siegel at their worst could never get away with just, "I liked it, too."

WE WANNA KNOW WHY!!!!

oh, and no, not yet. I've got Broken Flowers on request (interlibrary loan) and it hasn't arrived as of today.

 
At 24 July, 2007 16:20 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

LOL

This was a great movie, everyone knows that!

 
At 24 July, 2007 19:35 , Blogger c nadeau & t johnson said...

exactly! what the hell can a mere peon like me add?

 
At 25 July, 2007 23:07 , Blogger Tim said...

of course it was a great movie - but there must have been something that you didn't like. Something must have annoyed you about it....

i still think you're short changing our readers with your lame-o review....

too bad I can't call a do-over.

 
At 26 July, 2007 18:22 , Blogger c nadeau & t johnson said...

Actually, the movie is pitch-perfect.

 
At 28 July, 2007 05:12 , Blogger American Guy said...

i think scriby summed it up perfectly.

Yes, i read this thing. And if you're looking for films to review - i've got a couple of suggestions.

 
At 28 July, 2007 10:16 , Blogger Tim said...

suggest away there ag.

 
At 28 July, 2007 10:36 , Blogger American Guy said...

2 suggestions:

What's New Pussycat - Woody Allen's first screenplay starring Peter Sellers and Peter O'Toole. Just got it out of the library myself the othernight - brilliant.

Rashamon - I've been telling you to watch this for years - classic Japanese film on the nature of truth.

 
At 28 July, 2007 12:06 , Blogger Tim said...

I'm sure scribe and I will consider these titles, subject to common availability at our respective public libraries for the next review.

Can you come up with three more titles that you'd like to see reviewed, to give us more chances of finding a match?

 
At 28 July, 2007 14:10 , Blogger c nadeau & t johnson said...

Rashamon!!! Rashamon!!!

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home